Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Stéphane Chausson
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 - 3:04 am

Simon Vallet wrote, On 9/01/08 10:44:

In a [1]press communiqui (in french, sorry) they say they give 2^64 ip 
address to every customer.
To me, total ipv6 beginner, it seems a lot !
What is bad with "/64" ?
Are they sort of lying ? Playing with words ?

[1]http://www.iliad.fr/presse/2007/CP_IPv6_121207.pdf
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Good Good, (Tue Jan 8, 1:52 pm)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Marc Balmer, (Tue Jan 8, 2:15 pm)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Stuart Henderson, (Tue Jan 8, 4:16 pm)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Simon Vallet, (Wed Jan 9, 2:44 am)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Stéphane Chausson, (Wed Jan 9, 3:04 am)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Olivier Mehani, (Wed Jan 9, 3:45 am)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Simon Vallet, (Wed Jan 9, 3:59 am)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Claudio Jeker, (Wed Jan 9, 4:10 am)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Stuart Henderson, (Wed Jan 9, 4:16 am)