Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Simon Vallet
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 - 3:59 am

On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:04:59 +0100
Stiphane Chausson <stephane.chausson@laposte.net> wrote:


Well, in theory 64 bits would be sufficient for 2^64 adresses, but
that's not the way IPv6 functions -- in reality they are providing you
with exactly 1 usable IPv6 address (link in french), hence the need to
NAT or bridge:

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6#Adresses_IPv6

Simon
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Good Good, (Tue Jan 8, 1:52 pm)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Marc Balmer, (Tue Jan 8, 2:15 pm)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Stuart Henderson, (Tue Jan 8, 4:16 pm)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Simon Vallet, (Wed Jan 9, 2:44 am)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Stéphane Chausson, (Wed Jan 9, 3:04 am)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Olivier Mehani, (Wed Jan 9, 3:45 am)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Simon Vallet, (Wed Jan 9, 3:59 am)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Claudio Jeker, (Wed Jan 9, 4:10 am)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Stuart Henderson, (Wed Jan 9, 4:16 am)