Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ted Unangst
Date: Friday, January 15, 2010 - 6:54 pm

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:12 PM, nixlists <nixmlists@gmail.com> wrote:

I hope that doesn't mean what I interpret it to mean, because if you
write one byte to the beginning of a file and one byte to the end of a
file, there's no guarantee which byte hits the disk first.  The other
interpretation of it, meaning that you won't ever write half a byte,
is true, but strikes me as exceptionally obvious and true of every
filesystem.

So what does it mean for a single byte write to be atomic?
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Jean-Francois, (Thu Jan 14, 10:50 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina, (Thu Jan 14, 11:06 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, nixlists, (Thu Jan 14, 11:41 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Marco Peereboom, (Thu Jan 14, 12:06 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Denis Doroshenko, (Thu Jan 14, 2:26 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, nixlists, (Thu Jan 14, 3:09 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Ted Unangst, (Thu Jan 14, 3:34 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Marco Peereboom, (Thu Jan 14, 4:11 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Ben Calvert, (Thu Jan 14, 4:24 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, nixlists, (Thu Jan 14, 4:42 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Marco Peereboom, (Thu Jan 14, 5:33 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, nixlists, (Thu Jan 14, 5:55 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Marco Peereboom, (Thu Jan 14, 7:16 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, nixlists, (Thu Jan 14, 10:05 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Ted Unangst, (Thu Jan 14, 10:39 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Tomas Bodzar, (Fri Jan 15, 12:30 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, nixlists, (Fri Jan 15, 1:19 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Philip Guenther, (Fri Jan 15, 1:36 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Gilles Chehade, (Fri Jan 15, 1:41 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Tomas Bodzar, (Fri Jan 15, 1:51 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Gilles Chehade, (Fri Jan 15, 1:55 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Gregory Edigarov, (Fri Jan 15, 2:07 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Jean-Francois, (Fri Jan 15, 4:57 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Jacek Masiulaniec, (Fri Jan 15, 7:03 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Marco Peereboom, (Fri Jan 15, 7:22 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Gilles Chehade, (Fri Jan 15, 8:55 am)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, nixlists, (Fri Jan 15, 3:24 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, nixlists, (Fri Jan 15, 3:27 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, nixlists, (Fri Jan 15, 4:12 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Marco Peereboom, (Fri Jan 15, 6:50 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Ted Unangst, (Fri Jan 15, 6:54 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Matthew Dempsky, (Fri Jan 15, 9:05 pm)
Re: OpenSMTPd actual development and integration, Ted Unangst, (Fri Jan 15, 10:06 pm)