On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:46:30AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
quoted text
> Are formatting problems in the man pages currently expected due to
> the change to mandoc or should those be reported as bugs?  I installed
> a snapshot form 2010-04-02 and saw this layout (same for 2010-04-05
> http://obsd.cec.mtu.edu/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/man47.tgz)
> 
> ./usr/share/man/cat1/tr.0
> ....
>                 ." All classes may be used in ." .Ar string1, ." and in ." .Ar
>                 string2 ." when both the ." .Fl d ." and ." .Fl s ." options
>                 are specified.  ." Otherwise, only the classes ``upper'' and
>                 ``lower'' may be used in ." .Ar string2 ." and then only when
>                 the corresponding class (``upper'' for ``lower'' ." and vice-
>                 versa) is specified in the same relative position in ." .Ar
>                 string1.  ." .Pp With the exception of the ``upper'' and
> ....
> 
> 
> fgrep .Ar ./usr/share/man/cat?/*
> shows only tr.0 to be affected (I didn't check for the other
> formatting directives).
This should indeed be reported, thanks.