> Theo de Raadt <deraadt <at> cvs.openbsd.org> writes:
quoted text
> 
> > A chit-chat on a public mailing list isn't going to find this supposed
> > bug.  Why discuss it?  Why not just keep prove it happened.
> 
> Yes, Theo. Though: How? This is what I tried to find out. 
> I showed the list if files. Do you assume I tinkered with it? Why should I?
> pfctl wasn't working correctly. Without the help of the list, I wouldn't have 
> been able to drill it down to some 70 files being of the previous version.
> Thanks to everyone who helped!
> 
> > Don't you see
> > how tiring it is to discuss it when we've seen no evidence?
> 
> It might be tiring, but what evidence do you want? Here, I want to solve a
> problem of files missing. Since I followed the Upgrade guide to the dot,
> rebooted to bsd.rd in the beginning, rebooted at the command prompt, we (I) need
> to find what went wrong. That's all. I don't even mind if the mistake was on my
> side, then I could learn.
> 
> So, please, specify the evidence that you need.

If everyone felt the need to debug the personal problem with their own
machines on this giant mailing list in the fashion you just did, I
will unsubscribe.

It isn't tiring -- it is just plain ridiculous.

Figure out what is wrong, THEN POST THAT.