I about talked myself out of believing that this happened after explaining
this to a cow-orker today. They were quite surprised i'd buy into something
this speculative and far fetched at all. After listening to him generalize
it back to me it seems even sillier.
Brandon
On Dec 16, 2010 6:34 PM, "Marc Espie" <espie@nerim.net> wrote:
quoted text > I'm not going to comment on the mail itself, but I've seen a lot of
incredibly
quoted text > dubious articles on the net over the last few days.
>
> - use your brains, people. Just because a guy does say so doesn't mean
there's
quoted text > a backdoor. Ever heard about FUD ?
>
> - of course OpenBSD is going to check. Geeez!! what do you think ?
>
> - why would OpenBSD be in trouble ? where do you think *all the other
IPsec
quoted text > implementations* come from ? (hint: 10 years ago, what was the USofA view
on
quoted text > cryptography exports ? where is OpenBSD based. Second hint: Canada !=
UsOfA).
quoted text >
> - why would the FBI only target OpenBSD ? if there's a backhole in
OpenBSD,
quoted text > which hosts some of the most paranoid Opensource developers alive, what do
> you think is the likelyhood similar backholes exist in, say, Windows, or
> MacOs, or Linux (check where their darn IPsec code comes from, damn it!)
>
>
> I know that a lot of the guys reading tech@ are intelligent enough to
*know*
quoted text > all the rather obvious things I'm stating here, but it's looking like a
lot
quoted text > of stupid, stupid web sites are using this as their *only* source of
> information, and do not engage their brain): if you read french, go check
>
http://www.macgeneration.com/news/voir/180982/un-systeme-espion-du-fbi-dans-openbsd
quoted text > and be amazed at how clueless those writers are.
>
> Just on the off chance that those idiots will read this, and realize how
> stupid their generalizations are. Theo was careful enough to state facts,
> and I'm a huge fan of what he's done (he's decided to go fully open with
> this, which was a tough decision).
> I don't see why this would impact OpenBSD negatively without affecting any
> other OS... especially until we actually get proof...
