Re: allow ugen(4) to attach to unused interfaces

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Yojiro UO
Date: Monday, January 3, 2011 - 10:13 pm

as the ugen(4) is too flexible (and unsafe) than other usb device drivers,
i don't like this work to extend ugen(4)'s area.

I know many userland applications which supports multiple platform using
ugen type interface (because they usually use libusb or ugen apis), but
it is no reason to support them without considerations.

.....

From usb developer's view (include me), this work is seems to the so
useful to use "unsupported" / "partially supported" device. hmm...

-- Yojiro UO


On 2011/01/04, at 8:18, Jacob Meuser wrote:

0x09a2" rev 2.00/0.08 addr 4
0x09a2" rev 2.00/0.08 addr 4
rev 2.00/16.00 addr 2
rev 2.00/16.00 addr 2
G510g-m" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 2
2.00/1.00 addr 2
*self
*se
*self
*se
port,
usbd_devi
usbd_devi
*se
usb_conf
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
allow ugen(4) to attach to unused interfaces, Jacob Meuser, (Mon Jan 3, 4:18 pm)
Re: allow ugen(4) to attach to unused interfaces, Yojiro UO, (Mon Jan 3, 10:13 pm)
Re: allow ugen(4) to attach to unused interfaces, Jacob Meuser, (Mon Jan 3, 11:20 pm)
Re: allow ugen(4) to attach to unused interfaces, Ian Darwin, (Tue Jan 4, 11:10 am)