Nigel Cunningham

Quote: That Would Require A Complete Rework From The Ground Up

Submitted by Jeremy
on June 11, 2008 - 9:19am

"I don't think I do want to have my own series of patches, because TuxOnIce doesn't remove or rework swsusp or uswsusp, but sits along side them. I'm not trying to mutate swsusp into TuxOnIce, because that would require a complete rework of swsusp from the ground up (TuxOnIce does everything but the atomic copy/restore and associated prep/cleanup differently)."

Quote: Pointless When The People Who Decide Don't Care

Submitted by Jeremy
on April 9, 2008 - 3:55am

"I'm going to go on record now as saying I think dropping the freezer is a silly idea. I'm therefore currently considering including the freezer in TuxOnice from the time it gets dropped from mainline.

Quote: Far Too Easy To Take a Cursory Glance

Submitted by Jeremy
on January 21, 2008 - 9:36am

"It is far too easy to take a cursory glance, say 'That looks okay' and move on to the next thing, isn't it? I was horrified when I saw the list of acks etc (including me) on the commit with the helper_unlock issue we just fixed. It's truly scary to think that none of us looked closely enough to pick that up at the time."

Quote: TuxOnIce Advanatages

Submitted by Jeremy
on January 4, 2008 - 1:48am

"Perhaps it will also help with whatever effort I find time to make towards convincing Andrew that [TuxOnIce] really does have significant advantages over [u]swsusp and kexec based hibernation."